RE: queston for Atheist
April 5, 2014 at 11:44 am
(This post was last modified: April 5, 2014 at 11:49 am by Rampant.A.I..)
(April 5, 2014 at 10:36 am)Doggey75 Wrote: Can't help but think he is a troll. He hasn't responded to anyone.
It's ok, he has Frodo to phone it in for him.
(April 5, 2014 at 8:55 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 5, 2014 at 8:11 am)Alex K Wrote: No, because in the theists mind, with the name god come so many more properties which piggyback their way in on this argument unnoticed. This alternative exposes hiw unjustified those are by doing away with the loaded name God and showing that it still works. Fleems neither have to be sentient, good, allknowing, omnipotent, bearded, there neednt be an afterlife, they don't want anything from us etc.
God has other properties, sure. But the properties that you mentioned are all identical to Gods. So we can call 'fleems' a sub category of God.
Define the properties of God in detail.
"Undetectable, eternal and can create universes" is not a placeholder for you to sneak in, heist and replace with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic God, all the characteristics and actions of that God in the NT and OT, and claim the bible is directly inspired by that God.
There are at least 109 other creator options.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Creator_gods
