queston for Atheist

[Silver]

f you have such great evidence of proving god doesn't exist, do it then.Prove that god does not exist.

You do realize that the burden of proof is on you, right? Of course, you do not. Otherwise, you would not have ignorantly asked the question that you did. If there is no proof that unicorns exist, it is more rational to believe that unicorns simply do not exist. At least until such time that it can actually be proven that unicorns do exist. Therefore, if unicorns do not exist, and someone states that they do, the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim that unicorns do exist when there is no evidence of the unicorn's existence.

To further illustrate your apparent ignorance, science truthfully admits to not knowing something because to state otherwise would be lying. Science seeks answers rather than filling in the gaps of knowledge with something that cannot be proven to exist.