Einsteins theories are obsolete
April 8, 2014 at 1:31 pm
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2014 at 1:39 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(April 8, 2014 at 7:32 am)Galacticer Wrote:(April 8, 2014 at 7:30 am)Zen Badger Wrote: But I looked up the wiki article on Tom van Flandern.
That was amusing.
Ohh trying that angle now?
won't help
it really is bollocks the whole of relativity
it looks like you are defending a belief system without any substance.
Sort of like Tom Van Flandern
Quote:In his book, and also in his newsletter and web site, Van Flandern alleged that experimental evidence is incompatible with mainstream scientific theories, but that mainstream scientists refuse to acknowledge this to avoid jeopardizing their funding.[9] He espoused a set of principles for assessing ideas, and dubbed theories that he deemed compliant with these principles as "Deep Reality Physics." He claimed that mainstream scientific theories, especially the prevailing theories regarding the big bang, solar system formation, relativity, and electrodynamics, are incompatible with his principles, and advocated his own replacement theories. Notably, he contended that some features on the surface of Mars were created artificially, likely by an extra-terrestrial civilization that had fled its original home planet which, Van Flandern believed, had been a moon of an exploded planet where the asteroid belt is now located. His views have not found acceptance within the mainstream scientific community.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern
Nutter Butters say the darnedest things.
http://youtu.be/q_XLE9WZKTw