Yes. What I didn't like was he was basically expecting double standards. He wanted to question at least some of us and didn't like it whenever HE was questioned about HIS beliefs regarding the supernatural. And yet he still went on asserting them. Then he asserting to some of us (at least to me) that it was us that were unwilling to debate! He kept dodging questions and digressing and flaming when he felt like it.
He was hypocritical. At least in the sense that he expected to question us and want evidence from us when he never gave any himself on the things (at least I) questioned him about. How come he can ask me for evidence but he can go on claming things and expect not to be asked for evidence himself? That's double standards! He was being hypocritical for a start.
And he saw at me and told me and said I can't have read what he put about earthquakes. So I responded with "You didn't answer my question I was asking about your evidence of the supernatural. I wasn't asking for an example of how the supernatural is misunderstood when its in fact he natural! (which is what he gave me).
Finally in the end just before he was banned he FINALLY said:"I don't have any evidence of the existence of the supernatural"
finally! He said it!!
So he had no right all along whatsoever for all this digressing hypocrisy and at times flaming! He told me to read "the fucking post" when he was referring to a post oh is that didn't respond to my question. I could have said back "It didn't address my fucking question. It was a complete digression, either you didn't read mine, or you fucking ignored my point!" but I didn't say that. I just told him he didn't answer my question. He kept asserting his claims without expected any questioning. He was the debate stopper not me!
And he was more than happy to question me! Didn't like it the other way around though. Complete debate killer and he told me I was bad at debating. I said if he has a problem with my debating then fine, explain whats the problem. Please elaborate.
And I explained why I certainly have a problem with his debating! As I have explained here! He's the debate stopper!
He was hypocritical. At least in the sense that he expected to question us and want evidence from us when he never gave any himself on the things (at least I) questioned him about. How come he can ask me for evidence but he can go on claming things and expect not to be asked for evidence himself? That's double standards! He was being hypocritical for a start.
And he saw at me and told me and said I can't have read what he put about earthquakes. So I responded with "You didn't answer my question I was asking about your evidence of the supernatural. I wasn't asking for an example of how the supernatural is misunderstood when its in fact he natural! (which is what he gave me).
Finally in the end just before he was banned he FINALLY said:"I don't have any evidence of the existence of the supernatural"
finally! He said it!!So he had no right all along whatsoever for all this digressing hypocrisy and at times flaming! He told me to read "the fucking post" when he was referring to a post oh is that didn't respond to my question. I could have said back "It didn't address my fucking question. It was a complete digression, either you didn't read mine, or you fucking ignored my point!" but I didn't say that. I just told him he didn't answer my question. He kept asserting his claims without expected any questioning. He was the debate stopper not me!
And he was more than happy to question me! Didn't like it the other way around though. Complete debate killer and he told me I was bad at debating. I said if he has a problem with my debating then fine, explain whats the problem. Please elaborate.
And I explained why I certainly have a problem with his debating! As I have explained here! He's the debate stopper!
