Daystar

[Purple Rabbit]

@ Purple Rabbit: If he doesn't answer questioned claims. Wouldn't you be mad NOT to put him on the ignore list? So what's the difference between him having no one to debate with and him being banned?
I guess perhaps there could be some here who actually don't mind him claiming stuff that he doesn't expect to be questioned and then questioning everyone else. Which is hypocritical. Is that sort of what you were referring to PR? Someone people mind not want to ignore his relentless hypocritical double-standards. I can see where you're coming from but doesn't he just completely disrupt the forum with that kind of behavior? If everyone decides to ignore him whats the point of him being on here?

You can place him on your ignore list for a number of reasons. If you think he is beyond debatable, that seems a good reason to me. But underneat is your urge to play the game of free speech by your rules. Rules btw that are by all means acceptable and preferable to me.

When everybody puts him on the ignore list, the poster himself still is in charge of his choice on free speech. No restrictions from the community prohibit him to comply to the accepted debating rules at any time. I prefer the exposure to free thoughts of others to any possible restriction on personal thought.