RE: GOD IS NOT DEAD
April 14, 2014 at 8:40 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2014 at 8:44 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 14, 2014 at 7:05 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(April 14, 2014 at 7:01 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I was hoping you go see it because I can't adequately describe it.
As I said, I've read detailed descriptions of every argument presented; surely it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to point to your favorites so we can see how well they actually stand up?
Quote:Hope people learn that there is a God.
Remember, knowledge is demonstrated, not just asserted!
Also, I will note the rich, bitter irony of the fact that you apparently have no problems with science books changing the moment they start changing toward positions you already agree with.
I am hoping to focus on something else after this Sunday.
(April 14, 2014 at 7:02 am)tor Wrote:(April 14, 2014 at 6:57 am)Esquilax Wrote: Oh no! Books change to reflect that people are learning! How can this science book be reliable if it doesn't stick to its guns and keep all the demonstrably false information and insist that it's true even though we can all literally prove that it isn't!
Learning new things is bad!hock:
I actually get it too often. One dude said that science is false cause it changes. And truth never changes. So that which never changes is true
I am pro-science but not when others assert their views to make theories as if they are facts.
(April 14, 2014 at 9:15 am)Full Circle Wrote:(April 14, 2014 at 6:54 am)Revelation777 Wrote: no thanks, they change too often
The cognitive dissonance is strong in this onehock:
Let me ask you this, do you follow the Bible to the letter?
It hasn't changed since...wait...let me see...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Eng...anslations
original writings were inspired