(April 14, 2014 at 12:40 pm)Heywood Wrote: Here is an argument:I've emboldened the conclusion which you've included in the premise.
Premise 1: We will see events which cannot be explained by local physical causes only if God exists.
Premise 2: We do see events that cannot be explained by local physical causes.
Conclusion: Therefore God exists.
In order to "beg the question", the conclusion would have to be contained within one of the premises.
Sum ergo sum