Who throws the dice for you?

[Heywood]

Here is an argument:

Premise 1: We will see events which cannot be explained by local physical causes only if God exists.
Premise 2: We do see events that cannot be explained by local physical causes.
Conclusion: Therefore God exists.

In order to "beg the question", the conclusion would have to be contained within one of the premises.

I've emboldened the conclusion which you've included in the premise.

"If God exists" is not a conclusion. "If" is a conditional statement. You are conflating a condition with a conclusion. The conclusion or declaration that "God exists" is not contained with in any premises.

Sorry Ben but you get an F here.