The redneck strike again.

[Bad Wolf]

We are stuck inside a body as a driver would be stuck inside a car.

Really, because cars have these fantastic appliances called 'doors'. They open and close and allow occupants of the car to enter and exit whenever they want.

We are not the body but after so long that we are stuck inside we come
to believe that we are the body.

How do you know that? All the evidence says is that we are our body. Our mind is a manifestation of all the signals and synapses in our brain. Can you point to an example of a mind without a brain?

An idea which is locked inside a corral where nobody is allow to challenge.
Like the water in a pond that is deprived of movement and oxygen and become stale.
Quick example.
You are not interested in establish a relationship with God or whoever you
think of and at the same time whining that God or that person does not reciprocate.
When challenge by someone who explain you the irrationality of your
thinking you just say.......IF GOD WOULD EXIST IT WOULD MANIFEST.
Can you see now how a dogma is created?

Yea that is very much a strawman there. No atheist uses that at the reason they don't believe god exists. Most atheists simply say that theists haven't met their burden of proof. That is all that is needed. There is no evidence for the existence of god, therefore I don't believe it exists.
I can now ask you the same question you asked me: Can you see now how a dogma is created? We can neither prove nor disprove your claims, but you believe in them anyway, despite plenty of evidence to the contrarty. Sounds like a dogma you have there.

Not everybody need to look for information in books or other form of knowledge. You got one more dogma to deal with boy.

I fail to see how asking you where you got your information from is a dogma. The fact that you won't provide information as to where you got your percentages implies that you can't because you didn't look anywhere. You made them up off the top of your head. That makes you a liar and your percentages, invalid and unreliable.

Really? So Oppenhiemer was searching for hapiness when he made the atom bomb? So Darwin was searching for happiness when he came up with the theory of evolution, even though it caused severe unhappiness due to his christian beliefs?
Need I go on?

When you search in the physical world you never know whether you will find the royal jelly or a turd.

Your response makes no sense. You fail to address a clear contradiction of your assertion. Please try again.

Spirituality is all about stopping the cycle of birth and death or continuous reincarnation.

Fantastic! Now, please explain in detail, how exactly that works. I want to know specifics here.

You asked me one question and i answer you.
That does not mean that i am right or your wiki is right.
It is up to you to believe what you like.

Well, you disagreed with the definition from wikipedia and stated your own.

Now you say this.
Months ago you were saying that life is finite.
Don't you worry i do understand very well what you
are babbling.

I'm going to have to explain this to you again? What is this, the third time?
I don't believe life is infinite, because there is no evidence to suggest that it is infinite. There is evidence, to support the claim that life is finite. There has never been an occasion where someone has died and come back to life. Not one.
Once again, you don't understand what I said.

Qualifications don't mean everything. But they certainly are important. They let us know that the person speaking actually knows what they are talking about. They have passed tests by experts in a particular field and have demonstrated their aptitude at their subject. A person with qualifications is far more likely to know what they are talking about than someone who doesn't. If you heard a meteor was going to hit earth, which person would you be more likely to believe it from? A tramp or Stephen Hawkin? There is a very obvious answer here, lets see if you can get it.

As i just said yesterday the I control the mind and the mind control the body not the other way around so considering that the scientists are dealing with matter we can establish that those who control the I are smarter than those who deal with the matter or the mind only.

Once again, your response doesn't make sense, doesn't address anything I said and didn't answer my question.