Who throws the dice for you?

[Heywood]

Not an argument from ignorance.

Do you actually think saying "nuh uh!" is a rebuttal?

There was nothing to rebut. Your droning, "argument of ignorance" or "god of the gaps"...doesn't change my proposition into those things.

My proposition is that artifacts of our reality suggests the existence of God(or more accurately a supernatural element). How does that proposition appeal to ignorance? It doesn't.

It appeals to observations of quantum randomness. It appeals to the acceptance of a theorem which shows such observations cannot be explained by local physical hidden variables. We are not ignorant of either of these things.....both are accepted as facts of reality.

Perhaps instead of just droning "argument of ignorance" you can spell out why you think it is an argument of ignorance.