RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 21, 2014 at 10:31 am
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2014 at 10:53 am by tommynba.)
There's plenty of transitional fossils, the problem is that you look up only to creationists sources of information.
Transitional form doesn't mean it's gonna be a totally different "kind of animal" or a cross between two animals. Sometimes changes are very slight and minimal, but then creationists say it's not a transitional form... or they say it's a completely "new form" so they could not acknowledge it's actually transitional fossil.
I suggest you read some good archeology books. Unfortunately i don't know any good titles about the topic :/
Transitional form doesn't mean it's gonna be a totally different "kind of animal" or a cross between two animals. Sometimes changes are very slight and minimal, but then creationists say it's not a transitional form... or they say it's a completely "new form" so they could not acknowledge it's actually transitional fossil.
I suggest you read some good archeology books. Unfortunately i don't know any good titles about the topic :/