RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm
(This post was last modified: April 21, 2014 at 10:05 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 21, 2014 at 10:43 am)max-greece Wrote:Quote:This is what would be expected from intelligent design not macroevolution.
However that hypothesis can be eliminated due to the fact that 99.8% of all of the species that have ever lived have now gone extinct.
In other words - the level of intelligence evidenced in the design is too low to be worthy of consideration.
Unless your God is dumber that a bag of dead squirrels, that is.
I highly doubt the level of intelligence of a species will decide or not if they become extinct. I also don't understand how extinction supports evolution?
(April 21, 2014 at 9:46 pm)Minimalist Wrote:(April 21, 2014 at 6:19 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Everything in this post is wrong, Every single thing.
Let me rephrase: Nothing about this post is right. Not one single thing.
Boru
What would you expect...look who posted it.
If it supported your view then it would be right?