Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 22, 2014 at 7:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2014 at 7:44 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(April 22, 2014 at 5:56 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:(April 21, 2014 at 5:54 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Once again, if the theory of abiogenesis is false, it does not mean anything else in science is. It only means we don't yet understand how life arose.
This seems to be a common reply to those who reject God and don't have an answer to perplexing questions. "We don't yet but we are working on it." The problem is that the answer is, "God." Because some don't like that answer they keep searching in vain.
Now you're not even confronting the objection. You're off in left field somewhere, with a personal insult twist.
Quote:This seems to be a common reply to those who reject Zeus and don't have an answer to the perplexing question of lightning. "We don't about lightning yet but we are working on it." The problem is that the answer is, "Zeus." Because some don't like that answer they keep searching in vain.
What you don't realize is the you've latched on to a source not only laughed at by atheists, but the entire scientific community at large, secular and religious scientists alike.
If you're fine with throwing away your argument and admitting you've lost, sticking to this source is a clear indicator.
