RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
April 24, 2014 at 6:36 pm
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2014 at 6:37 pm by Cyberman.)
(April 24, 2014 at 6:09 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: Hold on just one cotton pickin' minute! You guys are putting me in a no win situation here.
1. I present an argument and it is ok for everyone to quote any source they want. I use AIG and I get lambasted.
2. I put down a link with info to address an issue and I get a warning.
3. I use quotes from Darwin and other scientists and I'm quote mining and called a liar.
4. I share my beliefs and I'm called a nut and a ignoramus
5. I make a slight joke and I get raked over the coals
6. One of your atheist buddies tears me down and they get kudos and high fives
what gives?
1. Everyone else is quoting from reliable, unbiased sources with no agenda. Your source is infamous for being selective with its honesty and has as its fundamental principle a statement declaring that anything running counter to the bible story will be ignored.
2. Stop lying. You put down link after link - not just one - without adding your own views and which forms your entire argument. This is a violation of Forum Rule #1, our Prime Directive.
3. You posted snippets of quotes, carefully edited to make them appear to say the opposite. If there is another word to describe a person not telling the truth, please tell me what it is.
4. If your beliefs can't stand up to criticism, and instead attract mockery, I suggest you need to rethink your approach to those beliefs.
5. Welcome to the internet.
6. One? I think we'll need a link so we know which one rubbed your rhubarb.
Any help to you?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
