(April 25, 2014 at 7:07 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote:(April 25, 2014 at 6:55 pm)Heywood Wrote: I disagree with your characterization that forcing a baker to make a wedding cake for a wedding that he does not recognize is discrimination against the baker. It is rather forcing the baker to take an action against his will for the benefit of someone else. We normally call this slavery not discrimination.
This is the point I made and you failed to address it.
That's because it is not a valid point. Slavery is unpaid indentured servitude where the slave becomes property of the master.
A baker is paid by his customer for his services.
By the way, where are all these gay-hating ultra masculine bakers? Have they considered getting a different job?
If I told you that you had to work for Walmart or not allowed work at all.....would you consider yourself a free person just because they paid you minimum wage? Negative....you would think of yourself as a slave.
