Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[Esquilax]

It is possible that the so-called evidence is deemed evidence because of how one perceives it? What might be overwhelming evidence for one scientist is very questionable to another. I am sure I know which one you would refer to.

So when one sees evolution happening in front of them, that comes down to opinion? When we find evidence of religions that are older than creationism claims the earth it, that's just down to opinion?

This is a common creationist tactic, trying to devalue evidence down to just another opinion, but sorry, it's not. When you can see something in front of your eyes, that's objective, not subjective. It's not just my opinion that the sky is blue.