(April 26, 2014 at 11:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: We got a problem with Tiktaalik. According to this article the tracks of a tetrapod were discovered apx 20 million years BEFORE Tiktaalik. So, if he indeed he were a transitional fossil, he arrived too late to the party. Titaalik is a fish and worthy of a good ol' fish fry. Pass the tartar sauce.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/01/tik...MssRw.dpuf
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/01/tik...30621.html
No we have another problem with your source -- Casey Luskin is another notorious liar and sleaze-bag who can't be trusted.
Soo -- on to your clear and precise definition of a transitional fossil -- what is it?
A mind is a terrible thing to waste -- don't pollute it with bullshit.
