(May 2, 2014 at 10:46 pm)Godlesspanther Wrote:(May 2, 2014 at 2:07 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I believe the sources I used are valid
Valid? There are different types of validity. It's clear that your sources are not scientifically valid. They are not logically valid. They lack internal consistency and come no where near external consistency.
Perhaps there is some special way that these creationist dope pushers are somehow 'valid.' In what way are they valid, as in, what qualities to they possess that gives them validity?
Get real, Rev., the only reason you consider those sources to be "valid" is because they tell you the lies you want to hear and keep repeating even after you have been corrected. Knowingly repeating other peoples' lies is lying.
Tell that to Ben Stein.