(May 5, 2014 at 7:13 pm)Revelation777 Wrote:(May 5, 2014 at 11:30 am)Stimbo Wrote: Rev: Seriously, you need to pay close attention to that, because I don't want to have to deal with reports with your name on them with reference to General Forum Rule #1.
I don't understand, I got that from Ben Stein's documentary. Why can't I refer to a documentary? How is that breaking the rules?
I don't care where you got your information. My response to you was prompted by Esqulax's observation that "The fact that you keep claiming [Stein's propaganda] just shows that you aren't listening to a damn thing anybody else is saying to you." (addition mine for clarification)
General Forum Rule #1 - our Prime Directive - reads:
Quote:This is a discussion forum. This means that members should interact with each other in a proper discussion, and not purposely / repeatedly evade rebuttals made to them. Whilst members are not forced or required to answer every post addressed to them, ignoring them all and continuing to post similar content will fall in line with our "No Spam" rule. This includes posting links / copy-pasted content / scripture verses repeatedly, without adding your own comments or being relevant to the thread.
This is our primary rule and all other rules fall in line with this concept.
This is what got you into trouble last time. When you're not evading others' posts with snarky one-liners, you're spamming links to offsite apologist material as your entire argument. Think of it as writing an essay or report for an English class - expand on your cited material with your own thoughts, but don't hand in a photocopy of someone else's work and expect not to get called out on it.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'