(May 7, 2014 at 9:07 am)LastPoet Wrote: An angel would disprove evolution. A human hexapod would be indeed a falsification. As a crocoduck would.
Actually none of them would disprove evolution. They would disprove our current understanding of genetics and heredity, and thereby falsify one possible mechanism that we believe to actually underpin evolution. But alternative mechanisms can be conceived.
The things that would conclusively disprove evolution would be total absence of evidence of large cumulative incremental change through time of lineages. Unfortunately for the likes of revs the evidence of presence of this is as conclusive as evidence of gravity, evidence that the sun rises in the east, or the moon is round.
But nonetheless, realizing this is what it takes to convince thinking people that evolution is false, they keep beating that primitive, ignorant, idiotic drum.
Hence rev's so called "questions" and "arguments".