numerical mriacle.....again

[Hoopington]

That particular pattern is very unlikely. However finding some sort of pattern is not. If you look for patterns in random numbers you will also find them. There must be thousands of different patterns that one could look for. However normally with this stuff it is done the wrong way round. People add the numbers together in certain ways until they get a pattern. You will also find that almost every old document that exists has had the numerology treatment.

There was an even simpler more powerful pattern that you missed. The chapter numbers are each one greater than that of the last chapter. Perhaps the work of an all powerfull God...

thats exactly what i disagree with, there are not thousands of different pattern you could look for. It is quite limited and you might wanna define a pattern x or y to make it a specific pattern, but we would consider that to be absurd.

And i also agree that you might find patterns in every text, but not these ones, i consider them to be extremly unlikely to happen.

---

Did you check the calculations yourself?
No credit awarded if you don't show all steps and partial results.

In a standard scientific report, there is a section on materials and methods which allows anyone with suitable background and resources to confirm or deny the conclusions of the experimenters.

In this case, I'm highly suspicious that there are errors in the unchecked results. It is a repeatedly observed phenomenon that the devout will slant/fabricate data in order to confirm their preferred conclusions. My default position is that this is what has occurred.

My time is too valuable to look for where the fudging took place. Even if this investigation was done honestly, the argument that coincidences happen is valid. A true positive result is only circumstantial evidence of supernatural intervention of any kind. After that you still have to show which god, devil or impersonal ectoplasmic instantiation did it.

All numbers are correct, your comment implies that you find this pattern also kind of "special", i might be wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzTXNjGbavk he does it in front of your eyes and i also did both myself.

I do not understand why people really post things about the biblecode. The biblecode is not interesting, it would be intersting if you would not find any patterns or "prophecies" because the liklihood that these occur is very high.

And no, "you dont find patterns everywhere" .

Yes, you do, humans see patterns everywhere, it's what we do.

For better or worse.