(May 11, 2014 at 1:43 pm)RDK Wrote: There are much simpler answers for the fallacy of evolution.
And as we all know, "simple" is a synonym for "correct"!

Quote: First, the idea that an organism of any type could just start from nothing, consider this.
The idea that an organism of any type could just start from nothing... isn't evolution. It's not even abiogenesis, really. Thank you for just lending more credence to my claim in the OP.

Quote: A creature is a complex system of inter-related parts which must work in harmony for the animal to exist. Take away one working part, the whole animal dies.
If you take away a human appendix the human keeps living. My wisdom teeth were extracted, and I'm still here. Hell, you can even remove parts of my brain and other organs without killing me, so your claim here is just false to begin with. Doing just real well so far, champ.
Quote: All of the animals parts had to begin at one time. A creature could not have existed as a whole while waiting for all of the individual parts to assemble over time since that animal could not exist at all without all of them at the same time.
You do understand that evolution happens over successive generations, and not to single animals, right?
Oh, who am I kidding? Of course you don't.
Quote: This absolutely mean s that no animals are transforming themselves from nonliving collections of unused parts waiting for the installation of the last needed one in order to exist as a LIVING CREATION!
![[Image: idgif1.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-1bVIBm05g9g%2FUac070VejzI%2FAAAAAAAAAkc%2FrY3luw1d2Ho%2Fs1600%2Fidgif1.gif)
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!