Evolution, religion, and ignorance.

[Esquilax]

The ideas that am presenting here are not difficult to comprehend.

They also aren't at all accurate to the theory you're claiming to disagree with, which is the problem. You are misrepresenting what evolution is.

Consider a single cell organism that doesn't require a mate to propagate. Out of the ooze of non life comes a living creature. IMPOSSIBLE!

Except that we have experimental results that show that it is possible, and you have... a bare assertion that it's not. Caps lock doesn't make your point any more true, genius.

You must consider that each of the component parts that make up that creature had to be working from the start, SIMULTANEOUSLY!

Yes, but each of those parts could develop in complexity from simpler versions of themselves. There's no requirement that they suddenly poof into existence fully formed, and evolution doesn't at all say that they would. Again, learn what you're talking about before you decide that it's wrong.

If a cell could live with half of it's necessary parts missing, how did it manage to live years later while waiting for the needed ones to evolve? It couldn't. All of those NECESSARY parts are needed TOGETHER, AT THE SAME TIME, in order to be ALIVE!

And prior generations of any given organism had slightly less advanced versions of the same equipment. Why do you keep asserting that we think otherwise?

Most all animals around us are complete LIVING units that can't wait for new life altering parts to arrive. They simply had to be assembled as complete working mechanisms, not collections of un-aggregated pieces waiting to be assembled so that they can live.

You aren't even listening, are you?