RE: What would it take for you to believe in God?
May 12, 2014 at 9:06 am
(This post was last modified: May 12, 2014 at 9:26 am by Chas.)
(April 29, 2014 at 9:03 pm)te1148 Wrote:(April 29, 2014 at 8:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: There is no evidence for a god(s).
/thread
What has brought you to that conclusion?
The lack of evidence makes me see that there is a lack of evidence.
If you have some evidence to offer, please do.
(April 29, 2014 at 10:08 pm)te1148 Wrote:(April 29, 2014 at 10:07 pm)Kitanetos Wrote: Because he is an atheist.hock:
That doesn't at all answer the question. There are a lot of atheists who have never heard of this site and if they did wouldn't come.
Yes, it does. You asked why he was here and that was answered.
Please provide evidence for your assertion about 'a lot of atheists'.
(May 7, 2014 at 11:19 am)ChadWooters Wrote: As for evidence two words: necessary being.
One word: bullshit
The 'necessary being' argument is slipshod logic. It is an illegitimate attempt to turn mental conception into physical being.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
