Here's my question: should the ability of drugs and lab procedures be taken as evidence that "religious" or "spiritual" experiences are just brain tricks? Or should it also be taken as evidence that the human mind is deeply fallible, and not in general to be trusted as an interface to obective facts (like the existence of things)?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 28, 2026, 5:59 am
Thread Rating:
|
Is subjectivity just a matter of context?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| All Lives Matter | Paraselene | 161 | 70741 |
July 22, 2017 at 9:54 pm Last Post: Amarok |
|
| Proof Mind is Fundamental and Matter Doesn't Exist | Rational AKD | 348 | 134007 |
October 22, 2015 at 6:34 pm Last Post: bennyboy |
|
| Mind Over Matter? | emjay | 70 | 24931 |
April 12, 2015 at 9:11 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
| Truth in context vs ultimate truth | bennyboy | 20 | 8042 |
March 15, 2015 at 6:07 pm Last Post: bennyboy |
|
| Mind/matter duality | bennyboy | 86 | 57163 |
June 10, 2013 at 1:25 pm Last Post: bennyboy |
|
| If God exists but doesn't do anything, how would we know? And would it matter? | TaraJo | 7 | 5505 |
January 26, 2013 at 11:14 am Last Post: DeistPaladin |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
