Evolution, religion, and ignorance.

[Mister Agenda]

Don't try to misguide the discussion. A scientific fact can not be disputed if the information is logical.

A scientific fact cannot be disputed because the evidence is conclusive...even it it doesn't seem logical, it's still a fact if it's to what the evidence points.

You should be able to disassemble the order of the facts at any point and it should all fit together harmoniously (flawlessly). It's the flaws in teaching something with so many diverse mechanisms as if it was a simple 1-2-3. proposition.

I'm willing to blame your teacher, too. They say there's no such thing as a poor student, maybe it's true.

I continue to bring up more points to ponder for the amusement or learning of over 3000 visitors who have seen this discussion and refuse to get involved.

You move on to new points without acknowledging your previous points have been thoroughly demolished...that's true enough. Be straight with me: Is Esquilax paying you to support his contention that people who don't accept evolution don't understand it? If so, I appreciate times are hard, but I think you're overdoing it.

I don't expect to carry on a full blown debate with people untrained in the sciences.

We're not all untrained in the sciences. You seem to be implying that you are. Let me guess: engineer (sorry you other engineers out there, but it's an identifiable trend, and I'm sure it has absolutely nothing to do with a bias to see design in everything you examine).

But, everyone is entitled to hearing something else other than your ordinary condemnation of concepts which you do not understand.

Your problem isn't that we don't understand the concepts you're presenting, your problem is that we do, and they're just bullshit.

I'm trying to make this as simple as I can.

A better tactic with bullshit is to make it more complex and hope people will think it's something else.