RE: Evolution, religion, and ignorance.
May 15, 2014 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2014 at 10:26 pm by Chas.)
(May 14, 2014 at 11:51 pm)RDK Wrote: Don't try to misguide the discussion. A scientific fact can not be disputed if the information is logical. You should be able to disassemble the order of the facts at any point and it should all fit together harmoniously (flawlessly). It's the flaws in teaching something with so many diverse mechanisms as if it was a simple 1-2-3. proposition.
I continue to bring up more points to ponder for the amusement or learning of over 3000 visitors who have seen this discussion and refuse to get involved. I don't expect to carry on a full blown debate with people untrained in the sciences. But, everyone is entitled to hearing something else other than your ordinary condemnation of concepts which you do not understand. I'm trying to make this as simple as I can.
You have proven that you are utterly unqualified to make any intelligent or informed comment, let alone criticism, of evolution.
You lack the knowledge or understanding of the evidence, the theory, and even the scientific method.
You continue to embarrass yourself by posting your ignorant and misinformed nonsense.
(May 15, 2014 at 1:18 am)RDK Wrote: If the parts which were going to be used in a future plant, the beginnings of those parts would have to be present in order for the experiment to proceed. I f that is the case, then all creatures should have parts in semi-complete form waiting to be assembled later into something useful. Sorry- does't fly. Try again.
You are a fucking ignoramus. Have you never heard of mutation? If you have, it was probably from an X-Men movie.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.