(May 18, 2014 at 2:38 pm)Heywood Wrote: I'm not splitting hairs here. "Logically invalid" is not the same thing as "rationally justified in believing it".....it is not even close to being the same thing. There is no quibbling. There is only you moving the goal post....and you pull crap like this all time.
Quibbling? My ass....you are just attempting to obfuscate your errors.
And when I specifically explained what I meant the post after you asked me to, that didn't give you any hints as to what I was saying?

That's why I say you're quibbling, because I've had this pages long dialogue going into what I'm talking about and so on, and your only response once I'd fully explained myself was "nuh uh!": just an assertion sans evidence. You've got nowhere to go and so you're clucking about moving goalposts, probably because it's a term that cropped up in my last post and you somehow think "no you!" is also an argument.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!