RE: The redneck strike again.
May 23, 2014 at 9:58 am
(This post was last modified: May 23, 2014 at 10:03 am by Little Rik.)
(May 22, 2014 at 2:22 pm)Confused Ape Wrote: Regardless of the predominate meat procurement mode, the increased availability of protein and fat in the diet of H. erectus via oil-rich seeds, USOs and meat [17] would provide consistently available, high-quality, calorie-rich fuels for such energetically expensive adaptations as a large brain.[/b]
Quote:So, if our pre-human ancestors hadn't changed their diet to include meat, humans wouldn't have big brains. Without our big brains we wouldn't be arguing about diet on the internet. We'd just be sitting in some jungle going "Oook" and eating plants and insects. This probably would have been a lot better for the planet, of course.
So you came to the conclusion that is the meat that we have to thank
for our big brains?
I am afraid that your belief is one more guessing.
There is no evidence for it as these scholars are guessing like you.
I also got one guessing if you don't mind.
Meat reduce the consciousness as the frustration to be killed is
recorded in the meat and this prevent the consciousness to expand.
The level of brain-intuition is based on the level of consciousness
so less consciousness=less brains.
In other words consciousness must come from something sentient
which of course is not meat.
Quote:The same evolutionary genetic advantages that have helped increase human lifespans by regulating the effects of meat-rich diets also make us uniquely susceptible to diseases of aging such as cancer, heart disease, and dementia.
Talking about dementia just today on tv they were talking about the level
of dementia in Japan which is getting out of control.
These people eat a lot of raw meat (Sushi).
Until short time ago they use to get their proteins from soya (milk, tofu)
and they were quite healthy.
Now that they change this natural diet for something non-healthy they are paying the price.
(May 22, 2014 at 10:59 am)Riketto Wrote: You keep on guessing again and again but as all other guys here
you are not telling me why man can not deal with saturated fat, cholesterol and toxins like omnivore animals?
Quote:I posted links to articles about Inuit diet and the difference between meat from wild animals and domesticated animals fed on unnatural diets. As you obviously didn't bother to read them you can ignore this article as well.[url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/02/0218_050218_human_diet.html][/url]
Quote:"Evolving To Eat Mush" - : How Meat Changed Our Bodies
Funny, your link say........we can handle a diet that's high in fat and cholesterol...........
Again, at this stage (after dinner) i am unable to laugh but i will later on.
Quote:I loathe peanuts, walnuts, carrots and cucumber. I wonder what that's telling me about my previous life?
Let me GUESS.............................
(May 23, 2014 at 6:40 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: This isn't even meant as an insult, but it will be insulting but the things he has said.......I've heard similar stuff from people with schizophrenia. There was this one guy I saw on a documentary that was so sure that if he killed himself, he would go to hell and return to earth as a god. Ricky is like that, both with his level of certainty and his outrageous beliefs.
Ok. after the usual garbage let us concentrate on serious things.
CAN MAN DEAL WITH SATURATED FAT, CHOLESTEROL AND TOXINS?