(May 27, 2014 at 12:10 am)Chas Wrote:(May 27, 2014 at 12:06 am)Heywood Wrote: It is the same, You are dependent on other organism(s). You are not viable as an individual.
Then there is no such thing as a viable organism above the single cell.
Do you honestly think that anyone else accepts that as a correct definition of viable?
You are just like the black knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.
The pro-abortion folks use a narrow definition in order to justify abortion. Viability, in the general sense, is not a good rationale to justify killing a human being....one obvious reason is because none of us are really viable.