The redneck strike again.

[Little Rik]

I gave you links to a number of articles, including some about genetics, which showed that humans adapted to being omnivores etc. You dismiss anything which conflicts with your religious beliefs as 'just guessing'.

Which showed?
I would say which showed personal opinions.
They never showed that man can deal with saturated fats
cholesterol and toxins.
The clear evidence is for all to see.
Hospitals, rehab. centers, nursing home and jails are full of
sick people with diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, dementia,
Alzheimer, Parkinson diseases.
All these sick people eat a non veg. diet and all of them showed
that their arteries are clogged with cholesterol.
There are a lot of people around that keep on coming up with
hypothesis.
most of these hypothesis are none but mental masturbation.
Tell these denialists to go and check the arteries of dead people
(meat eater) and see what clogged them up

I'm a vegetarian and so are my husband and a couple of real life friends. Are we rednecks because we don't insist that humans aren't designed to eat meat?

There is a difference between insisting and non insisting.
If you insist that something work in this or that way without
having the evidence or without caring to collect evidence then
you are a redneck.
If instead you don't insist or you don't really care then you may
belong to the silent majority which may be driven by a shepherd
wherever he likes.
If on the other hand you believe in good faith that what is said
on the net or on any other source without caring to find out the truth
then you may be a gullible and naive person.
The choices are many as you can see.

None of the atheists here are likely to take you seriously when you say you get information through intuition.

Intuition help a lot in getting the correct information and the
physical evidence help also a lot.
If you then combined the two you can be sure that you are correct.
I worked in rehab. centers, nursing homes and hospitals so i got the
correct evidence unlike the professional mental masturbators
which create hypothesis after hypothesis without a rag of evidence.

---

Here we got some interesting evidence that meat is dung.

http://www.pcrm.org/health/health-topics...rt-disease

The US army look so well after his soldiers that they all get sick by eating
meat.

When battlefield casualties were examined during the Korean and Vietnam wars, American soldiers had significant atherosclerosis at only 18 or 20 years of age. Their Asian counterparts, raised on a diet consisting mainly of rice and vegetables, had much healthier arteries.


Furthermore it say..........Since our bodies make plenty of cholesterol for our needs, we do not need to add any in our diet. Cholesterol is found in all foods that come from animals: red meat, poultry, fish, eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt, and every other meat and dairy product. Choosing lean cuts of meat is not enough; the cholesterol is mainly in the lean portion. Many people are surprised to learn that chicken contains as much cholesterol as beef. Every four-ounce serving of beef or chicken contains 100 milligrams of cholesterol. Also, most shellfish are very high in cholesterol. All animal products should be avoided for this reason. No foods from plants contain cholesterol.


And then............In the leanest cuts of beef, about 30 percent of the calories come from fat. Skinless chicken is nearly as high, at 23 percent. Even without the skin, chicken is never truly a low-fat food. Most cheeses contain 60 to 80 percent of calories from fat, and premium ice creams often contain 45 to 65 percent of calories from fat. Butter, margarine, and oils of all types are typically 95 to 100 percent of calories from fat. Grains, beans, vegetables, and fruits, however, have comfortably less than 10 percent of their calories coming from fat.


So what is the difference between a denialist and a redneck?
Uhmmm, this is a very difficult question but i would say that both of them are idiots.

---

pcrm = Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine