(May 31, 2014 at 7:25 pm)Irrational Wrote:(May 31, 2014 at 7:21 pm)Artur Axmann Wrote: "IF human life can be created and designed without the need for God, then there is no reason why one must or should accept God's existence as an intelligent creator/designer of human life."
in its entirety.
Yes, I'm commenting on something Heywood said. If he agrees with it could have been possible without God, then his view is not reasonable as it violates the principle of parsimony.
Listen dipshit, all god claims including yours are nothing but gap filling. Claims of invisible magical super heros do not simplify shit. Look up "infinite regress".
Now when you can get your god claim proven in a neutral lab and beat everyone to the patent office, then we can talk. But you are no different to us than Muslims or Jews or Hindus or Shintoists Mormons or Scientologists. Please don't stupidly think you are the first to argue science proves your god or are the only religion that tries to pull this bullshit tactic.
