Froch vs Groves II

[naimless]

Every damn boxer has that 'body language'. If they don't think they're the best then there's no point in them getting into the ring. And who gives a shit what his nick name is or what shorts he wears? You judge a fighter based on this?

Yes, his general stance and posture is better than Groves. Hence why his big punches floor Groves. Groves doesn't even have a big punch in him, even if he did Carl wouldn't take it slouched with his head turned in the wrong direction.

What do you mean, yet again? Froch didn't knock him out in the last fight...

I don't believe he completely knocked him out in this fight either. Groves still got up in time if they counted it. Froch just knocked the clean shit out of him hard enough twice to make the fight stop yet again.

The fuck are you on about? It was one of the closest boxing matches you could get up until the one hit KO. Groves actually had his best round just before he got knocked out.

Yes that is what I am on about. Groves was actually the favourite in the commentators' eyes right before he got walloped, yet he was still the long shot with the bookies which means people were lumping it on Froch despite Groves in the ascendency. I bet on Groves to hedge my bets because it looked like a fairer fight than the odds he was given, but as soon as I bet on him he got put down. I believed the hype and I should not have.

You are an idiot. How can you say he should not have 'wasted his time' with this rematch? Did you even watch the first fight?

In terms of the sport of boxing, Froch has taken some of his years out of himelf by rematching the same opponent. Honestly the only reason was the location and the bucks, it was a waste of a boxing match though. I wish the ref had let the first one play on - Carl would have killed George with a few free shots.

Did you even watch this one? Groves has the ability to beat Froch, he gave him a pasting for 7 rounds in the first fight before it was prematurely stopped by the most ridiculous refereeing decision I've ever seen. In this fight he was with Froch all the way. Neither man had a significant advantage. It was one punch that ended it. One punch. It's not like Froch ever dominated Groves.

Whilst I agree with a lot of this, it's not like Groves ever dominated Froch. In the first fight, yes he got the upper hand and landed a sweet shot on Froch himself - however, as I mentioned before Froch can both take Groves best hit better, and land his own best hit better which Groves can't take as well. It is like a football (soccer) match. The teams are almost identical but at the end of the day Froch has a better goalkeeper and a better striker and they win 1-0 both times. Maybe the midfields never dominated eachother, maybe Groves has more possession in the first half. But the only way Groves is winning is if it stays level and gets decided by a judge.

He thoroughly deserved his rematch. His own fault for not capitalising on his opportunities, sure. He got KO'd with a brilliant punch fair and square. But to say he should not have wasted his time? Are you on drugs or are you just saying these things to be annoying?

No doubt Groves is still wanking and crying himself to sleep right now. And with good reason. He thought he should have won the first match, he thought he should have won a rematch and at the end of the day he was wrong twice. I wish the first match had played on as well so he realised it sooner. I'm enjoying life mate. I'm not sure what the fuck you are doing up in my grille though.

^ wtf is this?

Celebrating the champion of boxing. Gotta celebrate the good times, even if they are undeserved, because you might not get a chance when you deserve it.

Carl's holdin the gold it's so gold it's so golden y'all
Golden Cobra

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i_qxQztHRI

What's with the casual racism too?

Blacks are the superior race. And will forever be the best fighters. The serpent can only slither so far.