RE: Science was once a child of the church.
June 5, 2014 at 11:46 pm
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2014 at 11:49 pm by mickiel.)
(June 5, 2014 at 11:42 pm)Beccs Wrote:(June 5, 2014 at 11:39 pm)mickiel Wrote: I put atheist in caps, until I was asked not to. I can put god in small letters if it offends you.
Not offended. Just making an observation.
So, I'm assuming your god is a singular creator god that you believe in? One with many names?
I don't know what God is , don't know his name or him. I am not Christian, so I do not believe in their trinity. God could a singular being with 8 separate consciousness, or some kind of being that we just are unable to describe. I don't know what God is, nor do I think anyonelse does; we can only speculate.
(June 5, 2014 at 11:44 pm)Cinjin Wrote:(June 5, 2014 at 11:30 pm)mickiel Wrote: I think that can only be true with humans who were before the time of Adam; which I believe existed, the scientific and Archaeological evidence is there.Wait wait. Are you saying that there is scientific and Archaeological evidence for the Adam of the Book of Genesis???
If so, I would really like to see this evidence you speak of please.
mick Wrote:I see civilization, or modern man, beginning with a
knowledge and awareness of God, but that argument is useless on an Atheist board.
It's also useless anywhere or with anyone that requires some amount of proof for grandiose claims.
I did not say there was proof of Adam, but that humans existed before he did. And proving God is not a grandiose thing to do, its quite simple. But its better to prove him to ones self, than somebodyelse.