Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 11:15 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science was once a child of the church.
#99
RE: Science was once a child of the church.
(June 6, 2014 at 10:33 am)mickiel Wrote:
(June 6, 2014 at 10:00 am)Cato Wrote: Using distain instead of disdain while admonishing someone's use of language is FUCKING hilarious.

I'm late to the thread so some of this might have already been covered.

Providing a list of Christian scientists is not evidence that the church was responsible for or had a harmonious relationship with scientific inquiry. In fact, even a cursory knowledge of the historical angst between the church and science demonstrates that science has been dragging the church kicking and screaming into modernity. Creationists, intelligent design supporters, stem cell research opponents and some global warming skeptics are proof that this is still the case to a great degree.

Scientific inquiry is antithetical to religious dogma. Considering scientists that were/are also Christian; their religion had/has fuck all to do with their science.

The fact that you didn't realize your argument was fucked on arrival betrays a tender age, gullible naivete, and/or a severely underdeveloped reasoning capability.



I fail to see the need to curse at my guest on thread, so you must excuse me if I do not respond using such disrespectful language. There is no need for it. I think it ruins debate and the human language. I don't understand the constant use of it here; maybe its an atheist thing?

Well no, it could not be that, because many Christians I debate use the same tactics. I don't like it when they do it either. It spoils a conversation in my view; its rude.

Maybe I am old fashion, and this is a new wave thingy.

Swearing is fucking brilliant. Wink Shades

Stop using your "offence" at the language used to deflect from the points being made. I almost looks like you're deliberately avoiding answering some very good points.

All of the above is meant with no offence my friend, I'd suggest maybe not being such a timid little flower.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science was once a child of the church. - by mickiel - June 5, 2014 at 9:45 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 9:52 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 6, 2014 at 10:00 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Hoopington - June 6, 2014 at 10:57 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:26 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:41 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:53 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:00 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:15 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:06 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:16 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:12 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:21 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:38 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:48 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:44 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:19 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:58 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 6, 2014 at 12:06 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:15 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:33 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:08 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:58 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 11:54 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 12:33 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 2:57 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 3:17 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 12:27 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 1:10 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 6, 2014 at 10:53 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 2:51 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 4:05 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 9, 2014 at 12:35 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 1:25 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 1:42 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Nine - June 9, 2014 at 3:14 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Nine - June 9, 2014 at 3:26 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 4:46 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 10, 2014 at 11:34 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 9, 2014 at 3:19 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 3:14 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 10, 2014 at 5:28 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 11, 2014 at 3:29 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Once, Twice, 20 Times a solar system. Brian37 1 447 November 28, 2020 at 2:52 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  NASA denies mars child slave colony Zen Badger 22 6650 July 2, 2017 at 12:12 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 8482 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow orogenicman 4 4499 December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Lethe



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)