Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 18, 2024, 11:00 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science was once a child of the church.
RE: Science was once a child of the church.
(June 7, 2014 at 2:57 pm)Losty Wrote:
(June 7, 2014 at 1:17 pm)mickiel Wrote: Yea, so we just got insanely lucky , and atheist are spreading the story of mammoth luck like religion spreads its story of insane hell.

Both pimping the incredible.




Well if I use your formula, both atheist and religion are declining. May have helped if religion went after more men, and atheism had more than just mostly white men.

How can they both be declining? Are you saying there's a rise in agnosticism or a decrease in human population?



I think the number of " unreligious " people is growing, but not all of that group can be considered atheist. Its hard to distinguish. Human population is growing.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Science was once a child of the church. - by mickiel - June 5, 2014 at 9:45 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 9:52 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 6, 2014 at 10:00 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:26 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:41 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:53 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:00 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:15 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:06 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:16 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:12 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:21 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:38 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:48 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 10:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:30 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 11:44 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 5, 2014 at 10:19 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 5, 2014 at 11:58 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 6, 2014 at 12:06 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:15 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:33 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:08 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cinjin - June 6, 2014 at 12:58 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 11:54 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 12:33 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 2:57 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by mickiel - June 7, 2014 at 3:07 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 3:17 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 12:27 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 1:10 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 6, 2014 at 10:53 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 7, 2014 at 2:51 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 7, 2014 at 4:05 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 9, 2014 at 12:35 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 1:25 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 1:42 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Nine - June 9, 2014 at 3:14 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Nine - June 9, 2014 at 3:26 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 4:46 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 10, 2014 at 11:34 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Cato - June 9, 2014 at 3:19 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 9, 2014 at 3:14 pm
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Tonus - June 10, 2014 at 5:28 am
RE: Science was once a child of the church. - by Losty - June 11, 2014 at 3:29 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Once, Twice, 20 Times a solar system. Brian37 1 447 November 28, 2020 at 2:52 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  NASA denies mars child slave colony Zen Badger 22 6649 July 2, 2017 at 12:12 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science FifthElement 23 8482 June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Rahul
  Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow orogenicman 4 4499 December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm
Last Post: Lethe



Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)