Science was once a child of the church.

[Esquilax]

The happenstance view is uncomfortable. I do not accept it. Its a chance filling of a serious hole in you're philosophy

And what, pray, is this "serious hole"?

As you attempt to cover up god, you do so be altering creation from a preplanned event to now an incredible roll of mythical universal dice.

I have no need to "cover up" god, dear: one doesn't need to cover up something that hasn't been evidenced, as it might well be that there's nothing to actually cover. I believe you've been told this before, but it isn't our job to refute every wild assertion you make.

As to the rest of your sentence, you seem incapable of stepping back and letting go of your assumption that the universe was created even in your refutation of my statement from a position where it was not. Your argument here is little more than, "you say the universe wasn't created, but that can't be true because it was created, and you're just reaching to make it seem otherwise."

My question is, is this total lack of empathy due to an unwillingness to even entertain that someone else might not agree with you on this, or an inability to see that?