RE: Argument #3: Mutations
June 11, 2014 at 12:30 am
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2014 at 12:31 am by Jackalope.)
(June 11, 2014 at 12:29 am)Revelation777 Wrote:(June 10, 2014 at 11:52 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Wrong.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB102.html
/thread
The so called new information that many evolutionists claim that takes place is a result of a corruption of already existing information. The examples you cite fail to achieve a "gain in functioning" mutation. In fact if there were an evolution from molecule to man we should readily see an abundance of this occurence, we don't.
So.... you didn't actually read any of the sources quoted in that link did you? Did you pull that answer out of your rear end, or is that what your handlers tell you to write?
Oh, and what are your sources for the above? Quid pro quo, Clarice. I showed you mine, you show me yours.