(June 15, 2014 at 5:00 am)ronedee Wrote:(June 15, 2014 at 4:54 am)Esquilax Wrote: Again, shifting the burden of proof won't work on... thinking beings. Do you have to disprove every claim I make or else believe it?LOL! I love how you and the others breakout the exacto knife when you are backed into a corner! Sorta like a rain dance for lame answers!
That's a pretty big if that you haven't even attempted to demonstrate, and even if you could that doesn't necessarily mean that god gets to make all the rules.
Given that I don't believe he exists, I don't really want him to do anything. This is a non-sequitur anyway, probably added in to try and distract from the unjustified presuppositions you're using here, and your inability to provide evidence for the things you believe.
Things that haven't been demonstrated to exist can't do anything, so it'd be very silly of me to want anything from him. Enough dodging though: do you understand the burden of proof or not?
Your roper-dope only works on dopes Moham&egger!
This "tough guy" talk is lame, especially when unwarranted given that we are taking your arguments seriously enough to address point by point, absurd as they are.
