RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
June 16, 2014 at 2:33 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2014 at 2:36 am by snowtracks.)
(June 15, 2014 at 10:24 pm)RobbyPants Wrote:"iterative probability" - saw you posted it and understand it. now, should I call a press conference?(June 15, 2014 at 2:30 am)snowtracks Wrote: poor guy is suffering so from such big, big numbers "but there are a lot of planets in the universe, snowtracks", "if we take into account the countless planets". first of all dufus, there are an estimated 10^82 atoms in the observable universe so you know the planets are less right? http://www.universetoday.com/36302/atoms...-universe/Lots of name-calling, and you still didn't address what I said.
and did you know the http://www2.astro.psu.edu/users/dfox/A00...lec37.html that the The Fermi Paradox has you flat on the ground and gasping for air? and do you believe in the galactic police force charged with painting over the graffitti left by other civilizations cited by the site?
You initially started talking about how "improbable" it must be for life to be on earth. I responded with iterative probability to explain this (and even gave an observable real-world example to help break it down so that maybe you could wrap your head around it). You respond by dodging and busting out a bunch of big words off topic to try and make it sound like you know what you're talking about.
Jesus Christ, you're useless. Snowball, are you doing this to convince us or yourself? So far as I can tell, you're pretty much the same as Godschild: you're only after our silence, rather than trying to actually convince us we're wrong with a cognizant point. Your only weapon in your arsenal is endurance. You figure if you keep posting here long enough, we'll all gradually leave the thread or put you on ignore, and eventually, you'll "win".
Useless.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.