RE: Evidence God Exists
May 4, 2010 at 7:30 pm
(This post was last modified: May 4, 2010 at 7:50 pm by AngelThMan.)
(May 4, 2010 at 6:52 pm)Paul the Human Wrote: *laughs*Oh come on, Paul. Do I have to put you in tavarish's intellectually-challenged category? I had a little bit of respect for you, but that's quickly waning.
You have a point there, Angel. We do keep repeating the same things over and over again, but it's because you have never once admitted that your evidence is not evidence. Now you have. Thank you.
When did I admit that my evidence is not evidence? I was challenging tavarish's claim that "answering a question is providing evidence for your case." The point is that those are two different things. Aren't you smart enough to understand that what I answered was not an admission that my evidence is not evidence, but a rebuttal to make a distinction between answering a question and providing evidence?
Paul the Human Wrote:This thread basically went like this:Let's define who Us is: die-hard atheists on an atheists forum. In the real world, my evidence would at least be considered rather than dismissed from the get-go.
Angel: Here is my evidence.
Us: That's not evidence.
Angel: Yes, it is.
Us: No, it isn't.
Angel: Yes, it is.
Us: No, it isn't.
Now explain to me why I should change my mind just because a few atheists on an atheists forum say that my evidence is not evidence, when the discussion would go differently in the real world? Give me something new and fresh so that I can address it.