RE: So, the SCOTUS sided with Hobby Lobby
June 30, 2014 at 1:03 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2014 at 1:04 pm by vorlon13.)
Might maybe possibly open the door to companies having the right to not insure subsequent spouses and maintaining insurance for the divorced (first) one.
I might rather like that, especially if only children from first spouse had coverage, and the second spouse's kid's coverage had to procured separately.
If there are enough complications and confusion from maintaining fidelity to all of christ's teachings (take THAT cafeteria christians!) it makes maintaining the fiction of religiosity all that much harder.
I might rather like that, especially if only children from first spouse had coverage, and the second spouse's kid's coverage had to procured separately.
If there are enough complications and confusion from maintaining fidelity to all of christ's teachings (take THAT cafeteria christians!) it makes maintaining the fiction of religiosity all that much harder.
