Abortion is morally wrong

[Dystopia]

Now directed at you pocaracas, did you know our prime minister thought of making abortion costly? In other words, we all pay for free healthcare a symbolic amount, maybe 5€ for consults and appointments, and poor people don't pay anything, it's never 100%. Abortion is 100% free but they thought of eliminating that privilege trough making it pay as much as other procedures have to pay too by a matter of equality.

Yeah... I think when something is completely free, people abuse it.
There should be a cost associated with the procedure.
Even more if it's done in a private clinic.

Not all new school doctors are against abortion, there will always be some ok, some against, some that are not ok, as long as we have people to perform it, it will not become a problem. Live I've already said forcing people is not the answer according to human rights.

I agree.
It's just that, if abortion was already a part of society for a long time, then doctors would know that they're expected to perform abortions and such objections would be nearly non-existent.

I discovered the portuguese law already solved the problem of objection. The thing is, the doctor who objects has the right to do so, BUT he also has the duty to send immediately the patient to another doctor who will willingly perform an abortion. This solves the issue, the conscious objector
fulfills his right, the pregnant woman fulfills hers, no problems, everybody is satisfied. This solves the issue of woman having to look for another clinic far away while potentially passing the temporal limit to have an abortion.

Yes it's true, but some doctors consider that abortion violates the right to live, it's something controversial and we cannot force people to think otherwise and impose our ideas.

The solution the law presented solves the issue properly, every doctor can object, but the patient must be sent to an appropriate doctor to terminate her pregnancy. I think this solution is good and gives society an equilibrium because no one gets their rights hurt. The law shouldn't look to satisfy more certain interests, but to fulfill both sides as equally as possible.

As for private clinics there is always cost involved, private entities benefit from the obvious economic freedom. Only those who can afford go to private health care. I went several times because public was too inefficient

---

Why is this nonsense still being argued?

The issue is already solved.