(July 2, 2014 at 1:23 pm)Mozart Link Wrote:(July 2, 2014 at 1:16 pm)LostLocke Wrote: Ah, there we go.But the concept of "superior" has a scientific explanation because everything has a scientific explanation. Therefore, since there would have to be a scientific definition of "superior," then that is what determines whether that definition applies here in my argument or not.
In science there is no such thing as a 'more superior living thing'. So, you're either making this up from your own opinion, or your "science" sources aren't doing science.
BZZZZZZZT! Wrong.
Not everything has a scientific explanation. When it does, the job of science will be finished.
Nor can everything have a scientific explanation. Concepts are ideas or general notions. They exist in our heads, not in the empirical world. They can be useful to science as a hypothesis or a means of description if they are well defined.
You haven't defined superior in any useful way.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.