RE: Science vs Morality
July 2, 2014 at 2:57 pm
(This post was last modified: July 2, 2014 at 2:58 pm by LostLocke.)
Two other problems here:
You're interchanging definition and explanation at times when they mean two completely separate things.
And second, superior is a relative term, not an absolute term.
You can't just 'be superior'. You have to be superior to something or at something.
IE.... Flying: Birds are superior to humans.
Building computers: Humans are superior to birds.
You can't just say "Humans are superior". That sentence in itself is meaningless.
You're interchanging definition and explanation at times when they mean two completely separate things.
And second, superior is a relative term, not an absolute term.
You can't just 'be superior'. You have to be superior to something or at something.
IE.... Flying: Birds are superior to humans.
Building computers: Humans are superior to birds.
You can't just say "Humans are superior". That sentence in itself is meaningless.
