Science vs Morality

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Ah, there we go.

In science there is no such thing as a 'more superior living thing'. So, you're either making this up from your own opinion, or your "science" sources aren't doing science.

But the concept of "superior" has a scientific explanation because everything has a scientific explanation. Therefore, since there would have to be a scientific definition of "superior," then that is what determines whether that definition applies here in my argument or not.

If the bolded statement above is true, please provide a 'scientific explanation' for each of the following:

-Dark matter/Dark energy.

-Methane found by the Viking lander.

-The horizon effect.

-Tetraneutrons.

-The anomalous drift in the trajectories of both Pioneer spacecraft.

-The placebo effect.

All of the above are real - their existence isn't in doubt. But there is - as yet - no scientific explanation for them. Kindly provide one.

And, before you embarrass yourself further with your stunning ignorance about what science is and does, try to remember that a definition does NOT count as an explanation.

Boru

Addendum: Watching you twist like a Millerite in the wind gives me pleasure. This must make me superior to you.