I am God

[Zidneya]

Just asking, could it be possible that you don't understand what Atheism is all about ?

Look who's talking
Because last time I checked we had tried to explain atheism to you.

You cannot be God if there is no god. You cannot believe in a god and believe that it doesn't exist.
We need to have god and no god so that 1+0= the meaning of life
Because 1+1=2 and that obviously makes no sense. Umm okay. Right.

---

It means both are equally the same and have joined the club of "Parental Deity", one follow and the other rejects, everything . . .but both will live as a child, no true self discovery.

Atheism is the ultimate form of denial of the Parental "God"

Really? Because last time I checked I didn't believed in Kali, Hera, Gaia nor Devi.
What can I say.
I support equitable treatment. It doesn't matter if the deity is a John or a yoko I still won't believe in them.

Atheism is not founded on real observation

"The Church says the Earth is flat. But I know that it is round. For I have seen the shadow on the Moon. And I have more faith in a shadow than in the Church." -- Magellan

of the ultimate factsof the universe.

Then if you understand the ultimate facts of the universe I suppose you wouldn't have any trouble explaining to me how you solved the string theory?

Since when blank denial is thinking ?

Since when God complex is wisdom?

I am God, you are God. . .and that’s why Allah says:

---

لا إله إلا الله
No (لَا) god (إِلَٰهَ) Only (إِلَّا) Allah (اللَّهُ)
No god only Allah

Allah says you don’t exist (no god). .because you are God.

Since when quoting religious scriptures is self discovery?

Since when is acceptance without evidence rational?

What are you referring to? Please clearly state your conclusion. . .

I need a emoticon with face palm for moments like this one.

This is the pattern that you consider as thinking . . . "[i]I deny, I deny, I deny, I have no burden of proof, and etc. "

No our pattern is: I see, I test, I study, I prove, therefore I believe. To denial something first it needs to be testable and probable. Until then we do not denial we simply ignore. First I need you to prove to you that the Emeral dream exists then we can discuss your denial towards its existence. Same goes for you. First you need to prove to me that souls and spirits exists. Because so far we haven't seen any evidence of gods, spirits, souls, or any plane of existence aside from the physical one. First we prove then we discuss until then it is fair to assume that it don't exists.

Then I'm waiting to hear that people can prove their existence. . .

If perception is so objective end reliable tool then no one will make a trust mistake ever.
“Perception is seeing people and things not as they are, but as we think they are.”

I believe your pattern of denial is quite terrible
no one can enter into any rational discussion with you at all. end.

You didn't came here to discuss you came here to convince. What? You thought we wouldn't notice?

I'm not discussing about Allah, I'm discussing about premises in the Quran, a Book. . and it exists.

You came to an ATHEIST FORUM backing your statements with a religious texts?
Geez we were so unprepared for that.

Check all the mistakes the Quran has
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/index.htm

Simple, no matter how many people I've seen in this world . . . there is still only one person there, me! Self is the world. . no ?

This world will continue even after you die.

It's the premises in the Book , and it is about to produce "a Book" , reality . . look for yourself. . another silly mistake.

In fact Allah has challenged the whole mankind to produce one like the Quran, and still . . . No one can produce one like the Quran.

Says who?
http://www.amazon.com/One-Minute-Wisdom-...0385242905
And why should one should aspire to write a book as the Quran? What you think that everyone cherish or likes the Quran? that will be wasting my life.

The ignorant tries to outdo the famous, the sage tries to outdo yourself.
Zidneya

That is what my book thought me.

Are you trying to suggest that I am the only thing that exists and everything else is a figment of my imagination?

Yeah thats what he's been trying to do all the time.
But let's not forget that according to him

WE are the ones who live in denial.

Yes, another blank denial. . . your religion.

Yeah because every morning I wake up believing in blank.
Please thinking that anything except oneself is an illusion that is blank denial. Just because you think that you think that everyone else thinks that as well is called psychological projection. You suffer from it not us. You think I'm wrong then tell me how many people have you claimed are in denial since you came here?

It is up to you to continue believing things you cannot prove. .

Said the guy who quotes the Quran.

but to me, it is not much like an atheist at all. . and in fact, it is equal to all religious people. .

Yeah because your opinion is the maximum authority for everyone else.

You could pretend all your life, and a mere definition does not make you an atheist. . . the fact, you are still the same with any religious people. It is a religion. end.

Do we kneel in front of the periodic table and make bows?
Do we pray to the vaccines to help us in our everyday life?
Do we see and interpret symbols printed in atoms? 
Is Einstein birthday an official holiday?
Do we have to pay penitence for breaking the sound barrier?
Do we confess when we get mathematics results without doing the equations?
Do scientific institutions have tax rate excepts?
Do our good deeds are awarded by the starts in the universe?
Do we get our morals from watching the weather report?
If I believe strong enough does the laws of the universe will change?

Pretending to be something you're not? Good luck !

I am God.

Right back at you God.

The God is "YOU", the Primary God. . . . self and ego-fulfillment. . . just like what the religious people did with their "Secondary God" (Allah, Jesus, Lord Krishna etc).

Okay here I go…

…..
Mmm something must be wrong with my god powers because I didn't create my own personal planet?

Yeap, anything from me is ego even if it is fairly written or without name calling etc . . and I wonder how does that related to the facts of this discussion.

Good then I won't have any problem convincing you of why I don't believe what you claim.