RE: Abortion is morally wrong
July 5, 2014 at 3:26 pm
(This post was last modified: July 5, 2014 at 3:30 pm by GrandizerII.)
(July 5, 2014 at 3:22 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Yeah, sounds legit. He has a right to his person, you can't compel him to risk that person. It has to be voluntary. A religious person sees some things as being dangerous -to their person- that you may not. Such as performing an abortion or being involved in, let alone facilitating, a blood transfer. How do we compel them without violating that right?
Yes, I'm saying that I'm of the view that their "right of conscience" should be overridden by the right of the client to receive medical procedure they want. If they're not up to it, then my view is that they shouldn't be in those specific fields where their rights of conscience will be violated.
Answering your edit: I say "fuck religious right" if it's going to conflict with other rights that are arguably more important. I'm not saying that they must be objectively more important. I'm saying my view is there are more important rights than right of religious expression.
