RE: Goldielocks Disappointment
July 6, 2014 at 8:26 am
(This post was last modified: July 6, 2014 at 9:18 am by A Theist.)
(July 5, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:(July 5, 2014 at 1:00 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: I hate it when this happens.
I wish they wouldn't announce its existence if its not confirmed or is still being disputed. Same nonsense happened with Gliese 667 C's supposed 7 planetary system, when there was actually a failure to account for any correlated noise within the data.
I wish that the 'science' media would stop referring to these planets as 'earth-like'. Yes, these planets may share a handful of qualities with our own, but it's like saying a lizard is 'human-like' because it has the same number of limbs. It's dishonest and it creates a ton of misconceptions, not just about the planets in question but our actual ability to even know such a thing.
The thought of Earth-like planets generates a lot of interest and makes for fascinating reading. I guesss it's the excitement of such possible discoveries which is why there seems to be a rush to premature publications of incomplete findings. It's a fascinating possibility though, but it's also disappointing when all the hype was nothing more than a mere false signal.
"Inside every Liberal there's a Totalitarian screaming to get out"
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
![[Image: freddy_03.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s25.postimg.org%2Fuq1y7aapr%2Ffreddy_03.jpg)
Quote: JohnDG...
Quote:It was an awful mistake to characterize based upon religion. I should not judge any theist that way, I must remember what I said in order to change.