(July 7, 2014 at 12:10 pm)Baqal Wrote: @SteveII
-If you read the context, you will see that I was pointing out that miracles are not a good argument to disprove the Bible. You would have to disprove the existence of God (or at least show that it is less likely than the negation) to disprove the existence of miracles, which then can be used as an argument against the Bible.
Do you realize that miracles can exist even without an intervention of any divinity?
Then your definition of miracles is not the same as mine. Please explain.